Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38047207›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

Longitudinal drug synergy assessment using convolutional neural network image-decoding of glioblastoma single-spheroid cultures.

Anna Giczewska, Krzysztof Pastuszak, Megan Houweling, Kulsoom U Abdul, Noa Faaij, Laurine Wedekind, David Noske, Thomas Wurdinger, Anna Supernat, Bart A Westerman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anna GiczewskaLaboratory of Translational Oncology, Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Gdańsk and Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0533-2453
Krzysztof PastuszakLaboratory of Translational Oncology, Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Gdańsk and Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Megan HouwelingDepartment of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2494-006X
Kulsoom U AbdulDepartment of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Noa FaaijDepartment of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Laurine WedekindDepartment of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
David NoskeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Thomas WurdingerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anna SupernatLaboratory of Translational Oncology, Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Gdańsk and Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Bart A WestermanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9898-9616

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In recent years, drug combinations have become increasingly popular to improve therapeutic outcomes in various diseases, including difficult to cure cancers such as the brain cancer glioblastoma. Assessing the interaction between drugs over time is critical for predicting drug combination effectiveness and minimizing the risk of therapy resistance. However, as viability readouts of drug combination experiments are commonly performed as an endpoint where cells are lysed, longitudinal drug-interaction monitoring is currently only possible through combined endpoint assays. Methods: We provide a method for massive parallel monitoring of drug interactions for 16 drug combinations in 3 glioblastoma models over a time frame of 18 days. In our assay, viabilities of single neurospheres are to be estimated based on image information taken at different time points. Neurosphere images taken on the final day (day 18) were matched to the respective viability measured by CellTiter-Glo 3D on the same day. This allowed to use of machine learning to decode image information to viability values on day 18 as well as for the earlier time points (on days 8, 11, and 15). Results: Our study shows that neurosphere images allow us to predict cell viability from extrapolated viabilities. This enables to assess of the drug interactions in a time window of 18 days. Our results show a clear and persistent synergistic interaction for several drug combinations over time. Conclusions: Our method facilitates longitudinal drug-interaction assessment, providing new insights into the temporal-dynamic effects of drug combinations in 3D neurospheres which can help to identify more effective therapies against glioblastoma.

Indexed as

convolutional networksdrug combinationglioblastomaimage processingsynergistic effect

Identifiers

PMID38047207
PMCPMC10691443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.