ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2023
Quantitative tools in microbial and chemical risk assessment.
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quantitative tools in microbial and chemical risk assessment.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The popularity of biological origin food protection substances is driven by demands from consumers for natural and clean label product, increasing various food-related safety and health concerns and sustainability issues. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are most promising because they are a large group of beneficial microorganisms commonly used in food protection due to their ability to inhibit the growth of pathogenic bacteria and enhance food safety. Extensive scientific research has been conducted to understand the mechanisms by which LAB exert their protective effects in various food systems. Even though LAB activity against various food pathogens and spoilers is distinguished, use of cell-free supernatant (CFS) is still under investigation. This report is dedicated to present how qualitative measures can elaborate in new bacteria-origin food additive investigation. As part of the EU-FORA programme, the fellow was involved in the risk assessment tasks and projects which include gaining basic knowledge in predicative microbiology fundamentals, including different types of modelling strategies; delivering essential understanding about experimental design, knowledge in three specific software tools (MATLAB, GInaFiT and DMFit) and gained overall understanding what are the main differences while modelling growth or inactivation models. Secondary activities were included as a way to expand competences beyond qualitative measures to overall all activities done regarding risk assessment and build a strong network of food safety experts and professionals to continue engaging in risk assessment beyond fellowship programme.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.