Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38047124›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2023

Training in tools to develop quantitative microbial risk assessment of ready-to-eat food with a comparison between the Romanian and Spanish food supply chains.

Ioana M Bodea, Giorgiana M Cătunescu, Alfredo Palop Gómez, Pablo S Fernández Escámez, Alberto Garre Perez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ioana M BodeaDepartment of Technical and Soil Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca 400372 Cluj-Napoca Romania.
Giorgiana M CătunescuDepartment of Technical and Soil Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca 400372 Cluj-Napoca Romania.
Alfredo Palop GómezDepartamento de Ingeniería Agronómica ETSIA-Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena Paseo Alfonso XIII, 48 30203 Cartagena Spain.
Pablo S Fernández EscámezDepartamento de Ingeniería Agronómica ETSIA-Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena Paseo Alfonso XIII, 48 30203 Cartagena Spain.
Alberto Garre PerezDepartamento de Ingeniería Agronómica ETSIA-Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena Paseo Alfonso XIII, 48 30203 Cartagena Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevention and control of bacterial contamination on ready-to-eat (RTE) fresh produce is an essential task to ensure food safety. Therefore, the development of novel and effective decontamination technologies to ensure microbiological safety of fruits and vegetables has gained considerable attention and new sanitisation methods are needed. The antimicrobial activity of essential oils (EOs) is well documented, but their application in fresh produce remains a challenge due to their hydrophobic nature. Thus, nanoemulsions efficiently contribute to support the use of EOs in foods by enhancing their dispersibility, their contact area and facilitating the introduction into bacterial cells. The combination of these factors ultimately increases their antimicrobial activity. Quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) is gaining more attention as an effective tool to assess and prevent potential risks associated with food-borne pathogens. In this context, the current project aims to study the effectiveness of different washing methods based on nanoemulsified EOs, comparing them against traditional methods, using a QMRA model for

Indexed as

Escherichia colifood safetynanoemulsionsoreganoproduce safetyrisk assessmentrosemary

Identifiers

PMID38047124
PMCPMC10687766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.