ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2023
Effectiveness of Heart Failure Checklist Management in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure: An Open-Label, Single-Center Controlled Study During 18 Months of Follow-Up.
Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Application of Checklist in Chronic Disease: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The efficacy of chronic heart failure (CHF) checklist management in reducing adverse outcomes of heart failure patients is still uncertain. This study explores whether CHF checklist management is more useful than usual care in reducing adverse health outcomes in the medium- and long-term among CHF patients. Methods: In our prospective study, 132 patients with CHF were randomly assigned to CHF management group and usual care group by random number method. Patients in CHF management group were conducted through CHF checklist by cardiologists and general practitioner. Patients assigned to usual care were treated by non-stationary medical group without checklist. All groups were followed up for 18 months. Results: There was no significant difference in overall mortality rate between management group and control group during 18 months (12.3% [8/65] vs. 11.7% [7/60], P = 0. 912]). The re-hospitalization rate of heart failure in management group (18.5% [12/65]) was significantly lower than that in usual care group (38.3% [23/60]) after 18 months of follow-up (P = 0.013). Median NT-proBNP level (632.3 ng/l vs. 1678 ng/l, p = 0.004) was lower in management group than that in usual care group. Cardiac ultrasonography was performed at 18 months between the management and usual care group. LVEDD (55.88±7.11 mm vs. 60.92±8.06 mm) and LVESD (43.25±8.42mm vs. 48.41± 9.02mm) were decreased (P<0.01). LVEF was increased (45.36±10.64% vs. 39.96 ±10.15%, P<0.01). The utilization rate of ACEI/ARB/ARNI, β-blocker were high in management group. Conclusion: CHF checklist management by cardiologists and general practitioners can significantly reduce the re-hospitalization and improve cardiac function. CHF management through heart failure checklist may improve prognosis in patients with CHF in the medium- and long-term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.