Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38046991›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-centered research and reviews2023

Pulmonary Specialist-Supported Health Coaching Delivered by Lay Personnel Improves Receipt of Quality Care for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Rachel Willard-Grace, Danielle Hessler, Beatrice Huang, Denise DeVore, Chris Chirinos, Jessica Wolf, Devon Low, Chris Garvey, DorAnne Donesky, Stephanie Tsao and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-centered research and reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rachel Willard-GraceDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Danielle HesslerDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Beatrice HuangDivision of HIV, Infectious Disease and Global Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Denise DeVoreDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Chris Chirinosindependent consultant.
Jessica Wolfindependent consultant.
Devon Lowindependent consultant.
Chris Garveyindependent consultant.
DorAnne DoneskyDepartment of Physiological Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Stephanie TsaoSan Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA.
David H ThomPrimary Care and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
George SuDivision of Pulmonology, Critical Care, Allergy and Sleep Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.

Funding

CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR025780 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2008 to 2011
$61.3M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Half of people living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) do not receive high-quality, evidenced-based care as described in international guidelines. We conducted secondary data analysis of a previously published study to assess the ability of a model of lay health coaching to improve provision of guideline-based care in a primary care setting. Methods: As part of a randomized controlled trial, we recruited English- and Spanish-speaking patients with moderate to severe COPD from primary care clinics serving a low-income, predominantly African American population. Participants were randomized to receive usual care or 9 months of health coaching from primary care personnel informed by a pulmonary specialist practitioner. Outcome measures included prescription of appropriate inhaler therapy, participation in COPD-related education, engagement with specialty care, prescription of smoking cessation medications, and patient ratings of the quality of care. Results: Baseline quality measures did not differ between study arms. At 9 months, coached patients were more likely (increase of 9.3% over usual care; P=0.014) to have received guideline-based inhalers compared to those in usual care. Coached patients were more likely to engage with pulmonary specialty care (increase of 8.3% over usual care with at least 1 visit; P=0.04) and educational classes (increase of 5.3% over usual care; P=0.03). Receipt of smoking cessation medications among patients smoking at baseline in the health coaching group increased 21.1 percentage points more than in usual care, a difference near statistical significance (P=0.06). Conclusions: Health coaching may improve the provision of quality chronic illness care for conditions such as COPD.

Indexed as

chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseCOPDevidence-based careguideline adherencehealth care qualityhealth coachinginhalersprimary carepulmonology

Identifiers

PMID38046991
PMCPMC10688918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.