ArticleIndian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India
Role of Textural Analysis of Pretreatment
Article in Indian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is routinely used for staging, response assessment, and surveillance in esophageal carcinoma patients. The aim of this study was to investigate whether textural features of pretreatment 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose ( Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study of 30 diagnosed carcinoma esophagus patients. These patients underwent pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT for staging. The images were processed in a commercially available textural analysis software. Region of interest was drawn over primary tumor with a 40% threshold and was processed further to derive 92 textural and radiomic parameters. These parameters were then compared between progression group and nonprogression group. The original dataset was subject separately to receiver operating curve analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to identify the cutoff values for textural features with a Results: A retrospective study of 30 primary carcinoma esophagus patients was done. Patients were followed up after chemo-radiotherapy and they underwent follow-up PET/CT. On the basis of their response, patients were divided into progression group and nonprogression group. Among them, 15 patients showed disease progression and 15 patients were in the nonprogression group. Ten textural analysis parameters turned out to be significant in the prediction of disease progression. Cutoff values were calculated for these parameters according to the ROC curves, GLZLM_long zone emphasis (Gray Level Zone Length Matrix)_long zone emphasis (44.9), GLZLM_low gray level zone emphasis (0.006), GLZLM_short zone low gray level emphasis (0.0032), GLZLM_long zone low gray level emphasis (0.185), GLRLM_long run emphasis (Gray Level Run Length Matrix) (1.31), GLRLM_low gray level run emphasis (0.0058), GLRLM_short run low gray level emphasis (0.005496), GLRLM_long run low gray level emphasis (0.00727), NGLDM_Busyness (Neighborhood Gray Level Difference Matrix) (0.75), and gray level co-occurrence matrix_homogeneity (0.37). Feature selection by principal components analysis and feature classification by the K-nearest neighbor machine-learning model using independent training and test samples yielded the overall highest AUC. Conclusions: Textural analysis parameters could provide prognostic information in carcinoma esophagus patients. Larger multicenter studies are needed for better clinical prognostication of these parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.