Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38046901›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery protocols2023

A systematic scoping review protocol to summarise and appraise the use of artificial intelligence in the analysis of digital videos of invasive general surgical procedures.

Anni King, George Fowler, Rhiannon C Macefield, Fang-Fang Quek, Hamish Walker, Charlie Thomas, Sheraz Markar, Jane M Blazeby, Natalie S Blencowe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anni KingNational Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (Surgical Innovation Theme), Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol.
George FowlerNational Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (Surgical Innovation Theme), Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol.
Rhiannon C MacefieldNational Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (Surgical Innovation Theme), Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol.
Fang-Fang QuekNational Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (Surgical Innovation Theme), Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol.
Hamish WalkerNational Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (Surgical Innovation Theme), Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol.
Charlie ThomasNational Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (Surgical Innovation Theme), Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol.
Sheraz MarkarNuffield Department of Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Jane M BlazebyNational Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (Surgical Innovation Theme), Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol.
Natalie S BlencoweNational Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (Surgical Innovation Theme), Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Intraoperative video recordings are a valuable addition to operative written documentation. However, the review of these videos often requires surgical expertise and takes considerable time. While a large amount of work has been undertaken to understand the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare more generally, the application of these techniques to automate the analysis of surgical videos is currently unclear. In this systematic scoping review, we sought to give a contemporary overview of the use of AI research in the analysis of digital videos of invasive general surgical procedures. We will describe and summarise the study characteristics, purpose of the applications and stage of development, to ascertain how these techniques might be applied in future research and to identify gaps in current knowledge (e.g. uncertainties about the study methods). Methods: Systematic searches will be conducted in OVID Medline and Embase, using terms related to 'artificial intelligence', 'surgery' and 'video' to identify all potentially relevant studies published since 1st January 2012. All primary studies where AI has been applied to the analysis of videos (recorded by conventional digital cameras or laparoscopic or robotic-assisted technology) of general surgical procedures will be included. Data extraction will include study characteristics, governance, details of video datasets and AI models, measures of accuracy, validation and any reported limitations. Ethics and dissemination: No ethical approval is required as primary data will not be collected. The results will be disseminated at relevant conferences, on social media and published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceoperativeproceduresreviewsurgeryvideo

Identifiers

PMID38046901
PMCPMC10688534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.