ArticleCureus2023
Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus With Multiple Sulcus Enlargements but No Ventricular Enlargement Resembling Brain Atrophy Over a Long Period Before Diagnosis: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A case of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus without enlarged ventricle and with negative tap test.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
- Evaluation of disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid-space hydrocephalus in progressive supranuclear palsy.Brain communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The most common imaging findings in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) are disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus, i.e., enlarged ventricles (Evans index >0.3), narrowing of the superior arcuate and median sulci, widening of the Sylvian fissure, and focal widening of the sulci of the brain. In the present study, we encountered an interesting case of a 73-year-old woman with iNPH with characteristic imaging findings of cerebral atrophy-like features and no prominent ventricular enlargement. Many cases might be difficult to diagnose as iNPH because of atypical imaging findings such as no prominent ventricular enlargement and so on. Even in cases with multiple atrophic sulcus openings without any prominent ventricular enlargement, the callosal angle and posterior commissure-level brain-ventricle ratio (BVR) could be helpful in the diagnosis, and bilateral opening of the occipitoparietal sulcus might be a key imaging finding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.