Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38046737›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Colorimetric Scale for Skin of Color: A Practical Classification Scale for the Clinical Assessment, Dermatology Management, and Forensic Evaluation of Individuals With Skin of Color.

Philip R Cohen, Michelle A DiMarco, Rachel L Geller, Lora A Darrisaw

Registry-linked trialAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06850610 (Accuracy Of The Owlet OSS 3.0 During Standardized Stable Hypoxia Plateaus), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06850610 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Accuracy Of The Owlet OSS 3.0 During Standardized Stable Hypoxia Plateaus

TypeinterventionalSponsorOwlet Baby Care, Inc.Ran2025 to 2025Enrolled163ConditionsHypoxiaArmsPulse oximeter accuracy under hypoxic conditions
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. FairDITA: Disentangled Image-Text Alignment for Fair Skin Cancer Diagnosis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comments on: racial disparities in dermatology.Archives of dermatological research · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Philip R CohenDermatology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, USA.
Michelle A DiMarcoForensic Pathology, Georgia Bureau of Investigation, Decatur, USA.
Rachel L GellerForensic Pathology, Georgia Bureau of Investigation, Decatur, USA.
Lora A DarrisawForensic Pathology, Georgia Bureau of Investigation, Decatur, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin of color refers to individuals whose skin color ranges from very light beige to very dark brown. Anthropologists and sociologists have previously recognized the importance of an objective classification of skin color for individuals with skin of color that does not include race and ethnicity. Since 1975, dermatologists have used the Fitzpatrick classification of sun-reactive skin types to categorize patients with skin of color; this classification was established for psoriasis patients participating in using oral methoxsalen and phototherapy clinical trial to determine the initial ultraviolet A dose. The Fitzpatrick classification merely classifies individuals as white, brown, and black; the individuals with white skin are further divided into four groups based on their burning or tanning capacity. This classification system does not provide reliable information with regard to the risk of skin cancer for individuals with darker skin color and does not aid in the evaluation of medical conditions with cutaneous involvement or assessment of appropriate cosmetic interventions for aesthetic management. Many clinicians, including forensic pathologists, incorporate the patient's race or ethnicity in their medical evaluation to describe the individual's skin color. Established scales for skin of color either include white skin color, or include 10 or more color types, or include both. We introduce a simple and rapidly performed scale that is not based on race or ethnicity to categorize persons with skin of color. The colorimetric scale ranges from very light beige to very dark brown and does not include white skin. The scale has five colors ranging from lightest (skin color type 1) to darkest (skin color type 5): very light beige (skin color type 1), light brown (skin color type 2), medium brown (skin color type 3), dark brown (skin color type 4), and very dark brown (skin color type 5); an individual with white skin would have a skin color type 0 in this classification of patient skin color. In conclusion, a scale that is not based on race or ethnicity is useful for categorizing individuals with skin of color not only for sociologists but also for clinicians who treat these patients. This colorimetric scale will be helpful for dermatologists to categorize persons with skin of color to predict their risk for developing skin cancer and to assessing appropriate cosmetic procedures and devices for these patients. In addition, the colorimetric scale will be useful for not only forensic pathologists but also other clinicians to provide a non-racial and non-ethnic designation of skin color type for their patients.

Indexed as

clinicalcolorcolorimetricdermatologyevaluationforensicmanagementpathologistpathologyskin

Identifiers

PMID38046737
PMCPMC10693386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.