ArticleCritical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine2021
Pressure support ventilation in intensive care patients receiving prolonged invasive ventilation.
Article in Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07199881 (Assessment of Respiratory Drive and Inspiratory Effort Across Pressure Support Levels in Patients After Major Abdominal Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Assessment of Respiratory Drive and Inspiratory Effort Across Pressure Support Levels in Patients After Major Abdominal Surgery
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Management and outcomes in women and men weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation: insights from the WEAN SAFE study.Annals of intensive care · 2026Article
- Protocol and statistical analysis plan for the identification and treatment of hypoxemic respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome with protection, paralysis, and proning: A type-1 hybrid stepped-wedge cluster randomised effectiveness-implementation study.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.