ArticleEvolutionary bioinformatics online2023
Toward a Better Understanding of G4 Evolution in the 3 Living Kingdoms.
Article in Evolutionary bioinformatics online, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- CGGBP1-Regulated Heterogeneous C-T Transition Rates Correlate with G-quadruplex Potential of Terrestrial Vertebrate Genomes.Journal of molecular evolution · 2026Article
- Mapping Patterns of G-Quadruplex-Forming Sequence Conservation in Primates.Journal of molecular evolution · 2026Article
- Differential Evolution of CDS and UTR Non-canonical RNA G-quadruplex Structures in Eukaryotic Transcriptomes.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Evolutionary dynamics of predicted G-quadruplexes in human and other great apes.Genome biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: G-quadruplexes (G4s) are secondary structures in DNA and RNA that impact various cellular processes, such as transcription, splicing, and translation. Due to their numerous functions, G4s are involved in many diseases, making their study important. Yet, G4s evolution remains largely unknown, due to their low sequence similarity and the poor quality of their sequence alignments across several species. To address this, we designed a strategy that avoids direct G4s alignment to study G4s evolution in the 3 species kingdoms. We also explored the coevolution between RBPs and G4s. Methods: We retrieved one-to-one orthologous genes from the Ensembl Compara database and computed groups of one-to-one orthologous genes. For each group, we aligned gene sequences and identified G4 families as groups of overlapping G4s in the alignment. We analyzed these G4 families using Count, a tool to infer feature evolution into a gene or a species tree. Additionally, we utilized these G4 families to predict G4s by homology. To establish a control dataset, we performed mono-, di- and tri-nucleotide shuffling. Results: Only a few conserved G4s occur among all living kingdoms. In eukaryotes, G4s exhibit slight conservation among vertebrates, and few are conserved between plants. In archaea and bacteria, at most, only 2 G4s are common. The G4 homology-based prediction increases the number of conserved G4s in common ancestors. The coevolution between RNA-binding proteins and G4s was investigated and revealed a modest impact of RNA-binding proteins evolution on G4 evolution. However, the details of this relationship remain unclear. Conclusion: Even if G4 evolution still eludes us, the present study provides key information to compute groups of homologous G4 and to reveal the evolution history of G4 families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.