Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38046638›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental social psychology2023

Women exaggerate, men downplay: Gendered endorsement of emotional dramatization stereotypes contributes to gender bias in pain expectations.

Gina A Paganini, Kevin M Summers, Leanne Ten Brinke, E Paige Lloyd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental social psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Suffering in Silence: Examining U.S. College Students' Painful Sexual Experiences and Their Relationship to Gender Roles.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Intersectionality, equity-mindedness, and access to care.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  12. QnAs with Shoham Choshen-Hillel and Alex Gileles-Hillel.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Sex bias in pain management decisions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Racial bias in perceptions of children's pain.Journal of experimental psychology. Applied · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gina A PaganiniUniversity of Denver, Department of Psychology, 2155 S. Race St, Denver CO 80208.
Kevin M SummersUniversity of Denver, Department of Psychology, 2155 S. Race St, Denver CO 80208.
Leanne Ten BrinkeUniversity of British Columbia - Okanagan, Department of Psychology, 3187 University Way, ASC 413, Kelowna, BC Canada.
E Paige LloydUniversity of Denver, Department of Psychology, 2155 S. Race St, Denver CO 80208.

Funding

Testing an integrated model of psychological mechanisms in Pain Treatment: Tests of pain-care recommendations, treatment differences across race, & the malleability of affective & cognitive mechanismsK01MD017287 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF DENVER (COLORADO SEMINARY) · PI Emily Paige Lloyd · 2022 to 2026
$694k
NIMHD NIH HHS K01 MD017287
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current work tested whether perceivers believe that women, relative to men, are likely to exaggerate versus downplay pain, an effect we refer to as the gender-pain exaggeration bias. The gender-pain exaggeration bias was operationalized as the extent to which perceivers believe women, relative to men, claim more pain than they feel. Across four experiments, we found that women were expected to exaggerate pain more than men and men were expected to downplay pain more than women (Studies 1-4). Further, judgments that women were more emotionally dramatizing than men contributed to this gender-pain exaggeration bias (Studies 2 and 4). We also assessed whether perceiver-level differences in endorsement of gendered emotional dramatization stereotypes (Studies 3-4) moderated this gender-pain exaggeration bias and found that endorsement of gendered emotional dramatization stereotypes moderated this bias. In sum, we document a relative gender-pain exaggeration bias wherein perceivers believe women, relative to men, to be emotionally dramatizing and therefore more likely to exaggerate versus downplay their pain. This bias may lead perceivers to interpret women's, relative to men's, pain reports as overstatements, inauthentic, or dramatized. Thus, the current work may have implications for well-documented biases in perceptions of (i.e., underestimating) and responses to (i.e., undertreating) women's pain.

Indexed as

emotiongenderimpression formationpainperson perception

Identifiers

PMID38046638
PMCPMC10688448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.