ReviewCureus2023
Role of Perfusion Index and Pulse Variability Index in the Assessment of Neonatal Hemodynamics: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Could Perfusion and Pleth Variability Index Be Useful in Managing Treatment and Morbidity in Patients with Gastrointestinal Bleeding?Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Performing Pulse Oximetry Screening in the Delivery Room Identified Newborn Infants Who Required Early Medical Attention.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2025Article
- Swaddle bath vs. tub bath for physiological outcomes and skin microbiota in late preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Normal Value of Perfusion Index in Healthy Neonates Born in Iran.Archives of Iranian medicine · 2024Article
- The Correlation of the Perfusion Index with Pain Scales in Infants Undergoing Surgery.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemodynamic monitoring of neonates is crucial because neonates are easily and acutely susceptible to hemodynamic disturbances. As such, non-invasive monitoring of hemodynamics is preferable. It has been postulated that non-invasive pulse oximetry determines the perfusion index and pulse variability index and provides accurate measurements to predict hemodynamic changes in preterm or term infants. Equally, numerous studies have investigated the efficacy of perfusion and pulse variability indices in monitoring neonatal hemodynamics. The aim of this study was to systematically review studies that have delved into the role of perfusion and pulse variability indices in the assessment of neonatal hemodynamics. The study collected data from 2010-2023 using the patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) search strategy using the databases PubMed, Scopus, and Excerpta Medica database (Embase). A total of 616 articles were evaluated based on their appropriateness and relevance; we included seven studies. As per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a systematic review. Our study concluded that these indices were effective in measuring hemodynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.