Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38046497›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Procalcitonin Use for Predicting Mortality and Morbidity of Patients Diagnosed With Sepsis Within the Intensive Care Unit.

Christopher R Chew, Dhaval Patel, Ania I Rynarzewska, Louise Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher R ChewCritical Care, Louisiana State University (LSU) Shreveport, Shreveport, USA.
Dhaval PatelCritical Care, Northeast Georgia Medical Center Gainsville, Gainesville, USA.
Ania I RynarzewskaMarketing, Georgia College and State University, Milledgeville, USA.
Louise JonesResearch, Northeast Georgia Medical Center Gainsville, Gainesville, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective Infections leading to severe sepsis and septic shock are among the top five causes requiring admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Up to 40% of ICU admissions contain a sepsis diagnosis. Without a clear marker to diagnose and manage sepsis, procalcitonin has been extensively studied for its usefulness in the management of bacterial infections. These studies, however, have been focused toward how it can be used to help guide when antibiotics should be initiated and de-escalated. There, however, has not been a study on how this biomarker could be used to predict mortality, and morbidity and help guide a need for antibiotic escalation. Design A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients admitted to the ICU at Northeast Georgia Medical Center between January 1, 2019, to June 30, 2021. Inclusion criteria were all patients above the age of 18 admitted to the ICU with a diagnosis of sepsis and having at least two procalcitonin drawn within 10 days of each other. Exclusion criteria were any patient with a diagnosis of COVID-19. Data Analysis was conducted to identify how delta procalcitonin could identify mortality and morbidity and if there was any change in antibiotics based on the delta procalcitonin.  Conclusion There was a statistically significant association between a delta positive procalcitonin and increased ICU length of stay. There was no statistical significance in expiration based on the antibiotic change in relationship to delta positive change in procalcitonin.

Indexed as

medical intensive care unit (micu)morbiditymortalityprocalcitoninseptic shock managementsevere sepsis

Identifiers

PMID38046497
PMCPMC10690065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.