ArticleBehavioural neurology2023
Acceptance Factors and Psychological Investigation of Clinical Trials in Cancer Patients.
Article in Behavioural neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient and Caregiver Reported Barriers to Cancer Clinical Trial Participation: A Scoping Review.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Factors Affecting Acceptance of Participating in Clinical Trials of New Drugs: A National Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2026Article
- Attitudes and Willingness to Participate in Drug Clinical Trials Among Patients With Cancer: Multistage Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Culturally Adapted Shared Decision-Making Tool for Breast Cancer Clinical Trials in China: A Nurse-Led Approach.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- Clinical trials in rheumatology: patient motivations and concerns as key determinants of recruitment.Reumatologia · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To understand the degree of oncology patients' awareness of drug clinical trials and oncology patients' willingness to participate in drug clinical trials and the factors influencing them. Methods: The differences in the relevant variables of patients' willingness to accept clinical trials were analyzed, and a descriptive analysis was done for the measurement data (mean and standard deviation). Pearson's correlation coefficient analysis was used to examine the correlation between willingness and the demographic variables. Stepwise regression analysis was used to explore the influencing factors of patients' willingness to accept clinical trials. Results: There were no statistical differences in age, gender, education level, marital status, place of residence, monthly income, medical payment method, and treatment time ( Conclusion: Age, treatment time, and whether they had been subjects were the direct influencing factors of patients' willingness. This study pointed out that hospitals should do a good job in the publicity of clinical trials of new drugs, expand publicity channels, increase publicity efforts, improve the awareness of clinical trials of the masses, and promote the enthusiasm of the masses to participate in clinical trials of drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.