ReviewJournal of orthopaedics2024
Non-metallic cerclage fixation methods for proximal femoral osteotomy and periprosthetic hip fractures offer promising outcomes: A systematic review.
Review in Journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hybrid plate-and-UHMWPE fixation for step-cut subtrochanteric osteotomy in crowe IV hip dysplasia: a finite element-supported case report.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Periprosthetic femur fracture (PFF) is an important complication to consider in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this systematic review was to compare outcomes of conventional metallic versus modern non-metallic cerclage systems for PFFs and proximal femoral osteotomy. Methods: The PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar databases were searched for clinical studies reporting PFFs or extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) in THA patients and cerclage fixation techniques. Results: Eight studies with 1362 patients (1366 hips) were included. The mean age ranged from 48.2 to 81.7 years, and the study population was 79.4 % female. The infection rate at the site of the PFF or ETO was 0.22 % (3 of 1366 hips), all occurring in patients with non-metallic cerclage fixation. Sixteen of 18 (88.9 %) cases of stem subsidence occurred following metallic cerclage fixation. Significant stem subsidence was substantially higher in hips with metallic device fixation compared to those with non-metallic fixation, at rates of 5.1 % and 0.19 %, respectively. Hips with non-metallic fixation had a clinical or radiologic healing rate of 93.9 %. Loss of fixation was only seen in hips with metallic fixation, at a rate of 0.6 %. Postoperative outcome scores were comparable across both groups. Conclusion: The findings of this systematic review suggest that available non-metallic cerclage fixation methods demonstrate similar clinical success as conventional metallic fixation methods when utilized in hip arthroplasty. The current use of novel materials appears to be safe and reliable for these surgeries and can be considered a dependable option for surgeons. Level of evidence: Level IV, systematic review of level III and IV studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.