Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38046406›Full record

ArticleAoB PLANTS2023

Responses of a common tropical epiphyte,

Xiao-Zhen Chen, J Aaron Hogan, Chiao-Ping Wang, Pei-Ling Wang, Teng-Chiu Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AoB PLANTS, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiao-Zhen ChenDepartment of Life Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 11677, Taiwan.
J Aaron HoganDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Chiao-Ping WangSilviculture Division, Taiwan Forestry Research Institute, Taipei 10066, Taiwan.
Pei-Ling WangInstitute of Oceanography, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.
Teng-Chiu LinDepartment of Life Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 11677, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epiphytes are highly dependent on atmospheric inputs of water and nutrients. Reductions in water availability associated with warming and climate change and continual atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition can affect plant growth but few studies have evaluated the effects of changes in both water and nutrient availabilities on epiphytes. We experimentally tested whether epiphyte growth is more water- or nutrient-limited, if nutrient limitation was stronger for nitrogen or phosphorus, and whether nutrient limitation interacts with water availability. We applied watering (high and low) and nutrient addition (control, +N, +P, +N+P) treatments to greenhouse-grown

Indexed as

Asplenium nidusatmospheric depositionclimate changeco-limitationepiphytesnutrient limitationwater stress

Identifiers

PMID38046406
PMCPMC10689150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.