ReviewFrontiers in toxicology2023
Advancing food safety risk assessment in China: development of new approach methodologies (NAMs).
Review in Frontiers in toxicology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- New approach methodologies for next-generation risk assessment of nanomaterials and nano-enabled products.Nano convergence · 2026Review
- Deep Learning-Enhanced UV Fluorescence for Automated Detection of Foreign Bodies in Tilapia Fillets.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Lipid Metabolic Effects Induced by Individual and Combined Exposure to Multiple Food Additives in Human Cells.Toxics · 2026Article
- Ensemble Learning Based on Bagging and Hybrid Sampling for Food Safety Risk Prediction.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multimodal AI for Real-Time Food Safety and Quality: From Sensors to Foundation Models, Edge Deployment, and Regulation.Food science & nutrition · 2026Review
- Safety evaluation ofCurrent research in food science · 2025Article
- Food contaminants: mechanisms of toxicity, computational assessment, and mitigation.Frontiers in toxicology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Novel techniques and methodologies are being developed to advance food safety risk assessment into the next-generation. Considering the shortcomings of traditional animal testing, new approach methodologies (NAMs) will be the main tools for the next-generation risk assessment (NGRA), using non-animal methodologies such as
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.