Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38046387›Full record

ArticleCritical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine2021

Values, preferences and goals identified during shared decision making between critically ill patients and their doctors.

Sharyn L Milnes, Yianni Mantzaridis, Nicholas B Simpson, Trisha L Dunning, Debra C Kerr, Joan B Ostaszkiewicz, Gerry T Keely, Charlie Corke, Neil R Orford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Empowering Older Patients in Advance Care Planning: Evaluating MyCare™ as a Decision Support Tool.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sharyn L MilnesUniversity Hospital Geelong, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.
Yianni MantzaridisUniversity Hospital Geelong, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.
Nicholas B SimpsonUniversity Hospital Geelong, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.
Trisha L DunningCentre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Debra C KerrCentre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Joan B OstaszkiewiczNational Ageing Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Gerry T KeelyUniversity Hospital Geelong, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.
Charlie CorkeUniversity Hospital Geelong, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.
Neil R OrfordUniversity Hospital Geelong, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID38046387
PMCPMC10692567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.