Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38046384›Full record

ReviewCritical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine2021

Accuracy of non-invasive body temperature measurement methods in adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Salvatore L Cutuli, Emily J See, Eduardo A Osawa, Paolo Ancona, David Marshall, Glenn M Eastwood, Neil J Glassford, Rinaldo Bellomo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Accuracy of non-invasive body temperature measurement methods in critically ill patients: a prospective, bicentric, observational study.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2021
    Article
  10. Turning up the heat on fever research?Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Salvatore L CutuliDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Emily J SeeDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Eduardo A OsawaDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Paolo AnconaDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
David MarshallDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Glenn M EastwoodDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Neil J GlassfordDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Rinaldo BellomoDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID38046384
PMCPMC10692504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.