ArticleMicrobiome research reports2022
Article in Microbiome research reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Symptom-linked disruption of the vaginal Lactobacillus-IL-2/IFN-γ axis in genitourinary syndrome of menopause related symptoms.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Vaginal-Derived Potential Probiotics and Their Postbiotics Alleviate Aerobic Vaginitis via Suppressing TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB Signalling Pathway and Potentially Enhancing Vaginal Barrier.Microbial biotechnology · 2026Article
- Disclosing α-lactalbumin impact on the intestinal and vaginal microbiota of women suffering from polycystic ovary syndrome.Microbial biotechnology · 2024Article
- Comparative genome analysis of microbial strains marketed for probiotic interventions: an extension of the Integrated Probiotic Database.Microbiome research reports · 2024Article
- Profiling of vaginalMicrobial genomics · 2023Article
- The core genome evolution of Lactobacillus crispatus as a driving force for niche competition in the human vaginal tract.Microbial biotechnology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A microbiome consists of microbes and their genomes, encompassing bacteria, viruses, fungi, protozoa, archaea, and eukaryotes. These elements interact dynamically in the specific environment in which they reside and evolve. In the past decade, studies of various microbiomes have been prevalent in the scientific literature, accounting for the shift from culture-dependent to culture-independent identification of microbes using new high-throughput sequencing technologies that decipher their composition and sometimes provide insights into their functions. Despite tremendous advances in understanding the gut microbiome, relatively little attention has been devoted to the vaginal environment, notably regarding the ubiquity and diversity of glycans which denote the significant role they play in the maintenance of homeostasis. Hopefully, emerging technologies will aid in the determination of what is a healthy vaginal microbiome, and provide insights into the roles of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.