Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38046354›Full record

ArticleACS omega2023

Computational Tools for Handling Molecular Clusters: Configurational Sampling, Storage, Analysis, and Machine Learning.

Jakub Kubečka, Vitus Besel, Ivo Neefjes, Yosef Knattrup, Theo Kurtén, Hanna Vehkamäki, Jonas Elm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Electron attachment to CHRSC advances · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jakub KubečkaAarhus University, Department of Chemistry, Langelandsgade 140, Aarhus 8000, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8002-0911
Vitus BeselUniversity of Helsinki, Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics, Faculty of Science, P.O. Box 64, Helsinki 00140, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4535-5422
Ivo NeefjesUniversity of Helsinki, Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics, Faculty of Science, P.O. Box 64, Helsinki 00140, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4549-0114
Yosef KnattrupAarhus University, Department of Chemistry, Langelandsgade 140, Aarhus 8000, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3549-7494
Theo KurténUniversity of Helsinki, Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Chemistry, Faculty of Science, P.O. Box 64, Helsinki 00140, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6416-4931
Hanna VehkamäkiUniversity of Helsinki, Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics, Faculty of Science, P.O. Box 64, Helsinki 00140, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5018-1255
Jonas ElmAarhus University, Department of Chemistry, Langelandsgade 140, Aarhus 8000, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3736-4329

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational modeling of atmospheric molecular clusters requires a comprehensive understanding of their complex configurational spaces, interaction patterns, stabilities against fragmentation, and even dynamic behaviors. To address these needs, we introduce the Jammy Key framework, a collection of automated scripts that facilitate and streamline molecular cluster modeling workflows. Jammy Key handles file manipulations between varieties of integrated third-party programs. The framework is divided into three main functionalities: (1) Jammy Key for configurational sampling (JKCS) to perform systematic configurational sampling of molecular clusters, (2) Jammy Key for quantum chemistry (JKQC) to analyze commonly used quantum chemistry output files and facilitate database construction, handling, and analysis, and (3) Jammy Key for machine learning (JKML) to manage machine learning methods in optimizing molecular cluster modeling. This automation and machine learning utilization significantly reduces manual labor, greatly speeds up the search for molecular cluster configurations, and thus increases the number of systems that can be studied. Following the example of the Atmospheric Cluster Database (ACDB) of Elm (ACS Omega, 4, 10965-10984, 2019), the molecular clusters modeled in our group using the Jammy Key framework have been stored in an improved online GitHub repository named ACDB 2.0. In this work, we present the Jammy Key package alongside its assorted applications, which underline its versatility. Using several illustrative examples, we discuss how to choose appropriate combinations of methodologies for treating particular cluster types, including reactive, multicomponent, charged, or radical clusters, as well as clusters containing flexible or multiconformer monomers or heavy atoms. Finally, we present a detailed example of using the tools for atmospheric acid-base clusters.

Identifiers

PMID38046354
PMCPMC10688175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.