Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38046281›Full record

ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2023

Recombinant Human Adenovirus Type 5 (H101) Intra-Tumor Therapy in Patients with Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer: Genomic Profiling Relating to Clinical Efficacy.

Qiying Zhang, Jing Zhang, Zi Liu, Juan Wang, Fei Wang, Tao Wang, Fan Shi, Jin Su, Yalong Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qiying ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, People's Republic of China.
Jing ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, People's Republic of China.
Zi LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, People's Republic of China.
Juan WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, People's Republic of China.
Fei WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, People's Republic of China.
Tao WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, People's Republic of China.
Fan ShiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, People's Republic of China.
Jin SuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, People's Republic of China.
Yalong ZhaoDepartment of Medical Affairs, Guangdong Techpool Bio-Pharma Co, Ltd, Guangzhou, 510000, People's Republic of China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Genomic profiles relating to H101 treatment-induced alterations are yet to be achieved. Here, we evaluated the impact of H101 via exome-sequencing approaches aiming to probe for potential biomarkers that are actionable in the treatment of persistent/recurrent/metastatic (P/R/M) cervical cancer. Methods: Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performd on paired pre- and post-H101 samples from 17 P/R/M cervical cancer patients who received serial intra-tumor injections of H101. Somatic mutations, including high-frequency mutations, microsatellite instability (MSI) status, tumor mutation burden (TMB), clonal evolution, and mutational signature were analyzed. Results: The median follow-up time after the H101 treatment was 14 months. Complete response was achieved in 9 patients, 3 patients achieved partial response, and 2 patients had stable disease, resulting in an objective response rate (ORR) of 70.6% (95% CI: 46.4%-96.7%). WES analysis showed no difference in treatment-related mutation characteristics, including non-synonymous-SNVs and TMB status. Patients with lower TMB were correlated with improved H101 response rates ( Conclusion: We conducted an unprecedented work via a WES-based approach and provided preliminary insights into H101 treatment-induced genetic aberrations in which some genes (TTN, KMT2D, ALDOA, DNAH7, ADAP1, PTPN23, and THEMIS2) could be considered potential therapeutic targets of H101-containing treatment in cervical carcinoma. Moreover, the therapy-associated characteristics such as clonal evolution and a mutational signature may warrant further evaluation of H101 in clinical settings for treating cervical carcinoma.

Indexed as

Adenoviruses, HumanCarcinomaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorFemaleGenomicsHumansMicrosatellite InstabilityMutationNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, Tumorcervical cancergenomic profilingH101recombinant human adenovirus type 5therapeutic targetswhole exome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID38046281
PMCPMC10691960
OpenAlexW4389059962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.