Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38046145›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Do barrier dressings reduce cardiac implantable device infection: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial (BARRIER-PROTECT).

Alper Aydin, Mehrdad Golian, Andres Klein, Calum Redpath, Darryl R Davis, Daniel F Ramirez, Girish M Nair, Martin Green, Mouhannad Sadek, Pablo B Nery and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04591366 (Barrier-Protect Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04591366 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Barrier-Protect Study: Do Barrier Dressings Reduce Device Infection: a Pilot, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorOttawa Heart Institute Research CorporationRan2020 to 2027Enrolled390ConditionsInfectionArmsBarrier dressing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Cardiac implantable electronic device upgrades and downgrades: a Clinical Consensus Statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Association (APHRS), Canadian Heart Rhythm Society (CHRS), Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS).Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Alper AydinDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Canada.
Mehrdad GolianDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Canada.
Andres KleinDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Canada.
Calum RedpathDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Canada.
Darryl R DavisDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Canada.
Daniel F RamirezDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Canada.
Girish M NairDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Canada.
Martin GreenDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Canada.
Mouhannad SadekDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Canada.
Pablo B NeryDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Canada.
Simon P HansomDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Canada.
Vicente Corrales-MedinaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, and The Ottawa Hospital, Canada.
George A WellsDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Canada.
David H BirnieDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures can be associated with serious complications, including infection with significant mortality and morbidity, necessitating removal of the device and prolonged hospitalization. One potential pathophysiological mechanism is pocket contamination at the time of device implantation. Therefore, steps taken to prevent contamination at this stage can potentially reduce CIED infections.The barrier dressing, an adhesive material applied to the skin, has the potential to reduce the colonization of the surgical site with host flora that can predispose to infection. There are a limited number of randomized prospective studies on barrier dressing use during various surgeries, but it has never been systematically studied in CIED implantation. Objectives: Do Barrier Dressings Reduce Cardiac Implantable Device Infection? (BARRIER-PROTECT trial; NCT04591366) is a single-centre, prospective, double-armed, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the use of an intra-operative adhesive barrier dressing to reduce the risk of end-of-procedure pocket swab positivity. We hypothesize that adhesive draping during implant procedures will reduce the risk of contamination from the skin flora. Also, we aim to investigate if the end-of-procedure pocket swab culture positivity can be used as a potential surrogate marker of CIED infection. Methods and Design: Patients undergoing a second or later procedure on the same device pocket (pulse generator change, lead/pocket revision or upgrade) will be enrolled. Eligible and consenting patients will be equally randomized to the use of barrier dressing or not using an automated web-based system. Patients, but not the operator, will be blinded to the arm. The person performing the pocket swabs will also be blinded. The primary endpoint is the end-of-procedure pocket swab culture positivity. The main secondary endpoint is the CIED infection rate. Discussion: This is the first randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of using a barrier adhesive draping on reducing the end-of-procedure pocket swab culture positivity. In this study, we are exploring a low-cost intervention that may significantly reduce CIED infection. Also, having a valid surrogate marker for CIED infection at the time of implant will facilitate design of future clinical trials.

Indexed as

BarrierCardiac implantable electronic deviceDrapeDressingICDInfectionPacemakerPreventionSwab

Identifiers

PMID38046145
PMCPMC10686845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.