ArticleClinical kidney journal2023
Design and methodology of the PRIMETIME 1 cohort study: PRecIsion MEdicine based on kidney TIssue Molecular interrogation in diabetic nEphropathy.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The validity of pathology codes for biopsy-confirmed kidney disease in the Danish National Patobank.Clinical kidney journal · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinical features of diabetic kidney disease alone cannot differentiate between the histopathology that defines diabetic nephropathy (DN) and non-diabetic nephropathy (NDN). A kidney biopsy is necessary to make the definitive diagnosis of DN. However, there is no consensus on when to perform a kidney biopsy in individuals with diabetes and kidney disease. Furthermore, the implications of NDN versus DN for management, morbidity and kidney prognosis are unclear. To address the gap in knowledge, we aimed to create a national retrospective cohort of people with diabetes and a performed kidney biopsy. Methods: Adults diagnosed with diabetes in Denmark between 1996 and 2020 who had a kidney biopsy performed were included. The cohort was established by linking a nationwide diabetes registry with the Danish Pathology Registry. Data from 11 national registries and databases were compiled. The type of kidney disease was classified using a three-step analysis of Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine codes reported in relation to the histopathological examinations of kidney tissue. The final cohort and classification of kidney disease was as follows: out of 485 989 individuals with diabetes 2586 were included, 2259 of whom had type 2 diabetes. We were able to classify 599 (26.5%) with DN, 703 (31.1%) with NDN and 165 (7.3%) with mixed disease in individuals with type 2 diabetes. In individuals with type 1 diabetes, 132 (40.4%) had DN, 73 (22.3%) NDN and 39 (11.9%) mixed disease. The remaining could not be classified or had normal histology. The overall median (Q1-Q3) follow-up time was 3.8 (1.6-7.2) years. Conclusions: This cohort is a novel platform based on high-quality registry data for important longitudinal studies of the impact of kidney disease diagnosis on prognosis. With regular updates of data from the Danish registries, the presented follow-up will increase over time and is only limited by emigration or death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.