ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023
Machine learning-based predictor for neurologic outcomes in patients undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Review of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Scoping Review Study.Health science reports · 2026Review
- Optimizing Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Candidate Selection in out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Machine-Learning Individualized Treatment Effect Approach Versus Rule-Based Criteria.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- External validation of ECPR prognostic models derived from pre-ECMO indicators in patients undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Evaluation of machine learning models for personalized prediction of benefit from temporary mechanical circulatory support after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
- Machine learning innovations in CPR: a comprehensive survey on enhanced resuscitation techniques.Artificial intelligence review · 2025Article
- Using machine learning to predict neurologic injury in venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation recipients: An ELSO Registry analysis.JTCVS open · 2024Article
- Prediction of longitudinal clinical outcomes after acute myocardial infarction using a dynamic machine learning algorithm.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Utilizing Machine Learning to Predict Neurological Injury in Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patients: An Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry Analysis.Research square · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We investigated the predictors of poor neurological outcomes in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) patients using machine learning (ML) approaches. Methods: This study was a retrospective, single-center, observational study that included adult patients who underwent ECPR while hospitalized between January 2010 and December 2020. The primary outcome was neurologic status at hospital discharge as assessed by the Cerebral Performance Categories (CPC) score (scores range from 1 to 5). We trained and tested eight ML algorithms for a binary classification task involving the neurological outcomes of survivors after ECPR. Results: During the study period, 330 patients were finally enrolled in this analysis; 143 (43.3%) had favorable neurological outcomes (CPC score 1 and 2) but 187 (56.7%) did not. From the eight ML algorithms initially considered, we refined our analysis to focus on the three algorithms, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, random forest, and Stochastic Gradient Boosting, that exhibited the highest accuracy. eXtreme Gradient Boosting models exhibited the highest accuracy among all the machine learning algorithms (accuracy: 0.739, area under the curve: 0.837, Kappa: 0.450, sensitivity: 0.700, specificity: 0.740). Across all three ML models, mean blood pressure emerged as the most influential variable, followed by initial serum lactate, and arrest to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) pump-on-time as important predictors in machine learning models for poor neurological outcomes following successful ECPR. Conclusions: In conclusion, machine learning methods showcased outstanding predictive accuracy for poor neurological outcomes in patients who underwent ECPR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.