Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38045629›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Survival Outcome of Retroperitoneal Sarcomas Treated With a Surgery-First Approach: A Single-Center Experience.

Pradeep Chandran, Joseph Francis, Alex Chakiath, Sulfekar Meera Sainaba, Prashant Girijavallabhan Nair, Jayas Siby, Gowri Madhusudanan Pillai, Jasira Padinhare Madathil, Martin Verheij

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pradeep ChandranTrauma Surgery, King's College Hospital, London, GBR.
Joseph FrancisPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, King Edward Memorial Hospital and Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College, Mumbai, IND.
Alex ChakiathSurgical Oncology, Malabar Cancer Centre, Thalassery, IND.
Sulfekar Meera SainabaGeneral Surgery, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, IND.
Prashant Girijavallabhan NairGeneral Surgery, Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, GBR.
Jayas SibyGeneral Surgery, Whipps Cross University Hospital, London, GBR.
Gowri Madhusudanan PillaiGeneral Surgery, West Middlesex University Hospital, London, GBR.
Jasira Padinhare MadathilBreast and General Surgery, Homerton University Hospital, London, GBR.
Martin VerheijTrauma Surgery, King's College Hospital, London, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare and complex tumors originating from the retroperitoneal space, an anatomical region nestled behind the abdominal cavity and shielded by the posterior abdominal wall. Late clinical presentation is a hallmark of retroperitoneal sarcomas. The symptoms are often nonspecific, and nodal metastases are rare. Computed tomography (CT) remains the investigation of choice, and a preoperative biopsy is usually not needed. Surgical resection remains the mainstay of treatment, along with adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy. Survival rates are in general poor, even after complete resection. In this study, we attempt to shed some light on the clinicopathological profiling of retroperitoneal sarcomas and their survival outcomes. Objective The objective of this study is to assess the demographic, clinical, and pathological profiling of patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma and to study the survival of patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma. Methodology We conducted a hospital-based retrospective observational study in a tertiary care center in South India between January 2011 and January 2021. We included all patients with histopathologically proven retroperitoneal sarcoma. Metastatic cases and those who underwent chemotherapy or radiation prior to presentation were excluded. Their demographics, pathological reports, and survival were followed up and collected, and statistical analysis was done. Results The study included 16 cases with retroperitoneal sarcomas across the decade in which the data was collected, confirming the rarity of the tumor, out of which more than 40% of patients were above the age of 60. The most common symptom was found to be a bloating sensation in nine patients, followed by abdominal pain in three patients. Seventy-five percent of the patients were found to have a T4 (i.e., a size of more than 15 cm) tumor at presentation. Well-differentiated liposarcoma was found to be the most common pathological variant accounting for 25% of the cases. The mean survival was found to be 8.05 years, which dropped to 5.74 years in Grade 3 tumors. Conclusion Retroperitoneal sarcomas are rare tumors of which liposarcoma is the most common variant. A significant reduction in the mean survival was identified in Grade 3 sarcomas compared to the cumulative survival time of Grade 1 and Grade 2 retroperitoneal sarcomas.

Indexed as

liposarcomaretroperitoneal sarcomaretroperitoneal sarcoma surgeryretroperitoneumrps

Identifiers

PMID38045629
PMCPMC10692993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.