Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38045529›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2023

An implementation strategy package (video education, HIV self-testing, and co-location) improves PrEP implementation for pregnant women in antenatal care clinics in western Kenya.

Joseph Sila, Anjuli D Wagner, Felix Abuna, Julia C Dettinger, Ben Odhiambo, Nancy Ngumbau, George Oketch, Enock Sifuna, Laurén Gómez, Sarah Hicks and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04712994 (PrEPARE), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04712994 nacompletednot on this map

PrEPARE: PrEP in Pregnancy, Accelerating Reach and Efficiency

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of WashingtonRan2021 to 2022Enrolled1,958ConditionsPre-Exposure Prophylaxis, HIV Infections, Pregnancy RelatedArmsPrEP Optimization Interventions
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Joseph Sila *Research & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Anjuli D Wagner *Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Felix AbunaResearch & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Julia C DettingerDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Ben OdhiamboResearch & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Nancy NgumbauResearch & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
George OketchResearch & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Enock SifunaResearch & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Laurén GómezDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Sarah HicksDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Grace John-StewartDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
John KinuthiaResearch & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.

Funding

University of Washington Developmental AIDS Research Center for Mental Health (UW ARCH)P30MH123248 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FLAHERTY, BRIAN PATRICK · 2021 to 2024
$5.8M
Testing implementation strategies to improve delivery of PrEP for pregnant and postpartum women in KenyaK01MH121124 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WAGNER, ANJULI DAWN · 2019 to 2023
$835k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH121124NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH123248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is recommended by the World Health Organization and the Kenyan Ministry of Health for HIV prevention in pregnancy and postpartum for women at risk for HIV. Integration of PrEP into antenatal care is promising, but delivery gaps exist in the face of healthcare provider shortages in resource-limited settings. Methods: Between May and November 2021, we conducted a difference-in-differences study (3 months pre-intervention data collection and 3 months post-intervention data collection) analyzing four intervention facilities, where the strategies were implemented, and four comparison facilities, where no strategies were implemented. We tested a combination of three implementation strategies-video-based PrEP information in the waiting bay, HIV self-testing, and dispensing of PrEP in the antenatal care rooms-to improve PrEP delivery. We compared absolute changes in the proportion of antenatal attendees screened for PrEP (PrEP penetration), the proportion receiving all PrEP-specific steps in a visit (HIV testing, risk screening, and PrEP counseling) (PrEP fidelity), and client PrEP knowledge, client satisfaction, and waiting time and service time ( Results: We observed significant improvements in PrEP penetration, PrEP offer, satisfaction, and knowledge ( Conclusions: An implementation strategy package with video information, HIV self-testing, and co-location of medication dispensing enhanced PrEP delivery across several implementation outcomes and client satisfaction, while not substantially increasing wait time or decreasing provider-client contact time. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , identifier, NCT04712994.

Indexed as

HIV self testingimplementation scienceintegrationpostpartumpre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)pregnancyvideo education

Identifiers

PMID38045529
PMCPMC10690761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.