Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38045514›Full record

ArticleCritical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine2021

Natural language processing to assess the epidemiology of delirium-suggestive behavioural disturbances in critically ill patients.

Marcus Young, Natasha Holmes, Raymond Robbins, Nada Marhoon, Sobia Amjad, Ary Serpa Neto, Rinaldo Bellomo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Sedation Practice in Intensive Care Evaluation, SPICE and beyond, Rinaldo's legacy in sedation and delirium research.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Is "behavioural disturbance" a clinically more useful concept than "delirium" for trials in intensive care medicine?Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marcus YoungData Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre, Austin Health and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Natasha HolmesData Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre, Austin Health and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Raymond RobbinsData Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre, Austin Health and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Nada MarhoonData Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre, Austin Health and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Sobia AmjadData Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre, Austin Health and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Ary Serpa NetoData Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre, Austin Health and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Rinaldo BellomoData Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre, Austin Health and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID38045514
PMCPMC10692527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.