Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38045483›Full record

ArticleArXiv2023

Gene expression in growing cells: A biophysical primer.

Ido Golding, Ariel Amir

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ido GoldingDepartment of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Ariel AmirJohn A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

ILLUMINATING CELLULAR INDIVIDUALITY THROUGH BACTERIOPHAGE INFECTION (2nd Period)R35GM140709 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI Ido Golding · 2021 to 2026
$2.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM140709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell growth and gene expression, two essential elements of all living systems, have long been the focus of biophysical interrogation. Advances in experimental single-cell methods have invigorated theoretical studies into these processes. However, until recently, there was little dialog between the two areas of study. In particular, most theoretical models for gene regulation assumed gene activity to be oblivious to the progression of the cell cycle between birth and division. But, in fact, there are numerous ways in which the periodic character of all cellular observables can modulate gene expression. The molecular factors required for transcription and translation-RNA polymerase, transcription factors, ribosomes-increase in number during the cell cycle, but are also diluted due to the continuous increase in cell volume. The replication of the genome changes the dosage of those same cellular players but also provides competing targets for regulatory binding. Finally, cell division reduces their number again, and so forth. Stochasticity is inherent to all these biological processes, manifested in fluctuations in the synthesis and degradation of new cellular components as well as the random partitioning of molecules at each cell division event. The notion of gene expression as stationary is thus hard to justify. In this review, we survey the emerging paradigm of cell-cycle regulated gene expression, with an emphasis on the global expression patterns rather than gene-specific regulation. We discuss recent experimental reports where cell growth and gene expression were simultaneously measured in individual cells, providing first glimpses into the coupling between the two, and motivating several questions. How do the levels of gene expression products - mRNA and protein - scale with the cell volume and cell-cycle progression? What are the molecular origins of the observed scaling laws, and when do they break down to yield non-canonical behavior? What are the consequences of cell-cycle dependence for the heterogeneity ("noise") in gene expression within a cell population? While the experimental findings, not surprisingly, differ among genes, organisms, and environmental conditions, several theoretical models have emerged that attempt to reconcile these differences and form a unifying framework for understanding gene expression in growing cells.

Identifiers

PMID38045483
PMCPMC10690283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.