Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38045451›Full record

ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2023

Using machine learning to enhance prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation.

Mark S Brahier, Fengwei Zou, Musa Abdulkareem, Shwetha Kochi, Frank Migliarese, Athanasios Thomaides, Xiaoyang Ma, Colin Wu, Veit Sandfort, Peter J Bergquist and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Mark S BrahierGeorgetown University Medical Center Washington DC USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5641-8543
Fengwei ZouMontefiore Medical Center Bronx New York USA.
Musa AbdulkareemBarts Heart Centre Barts Health National Health Service (NHS) Trust London United Kingdom.
Shwetha KochiGeorgetown University Medical Center Washington DC USA.
Frank MigliareseNaval Medical Center San Diego California USA.
Athanasios ThomaidesMedStar Heart and Vascular Institute Washington DC USA.
Xiaoyang MaGeorgetown University Medical Center Washington DC USA.
Colin WuNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Bethesda Maryland USA.
Veit SandfortStanford Medicine Stanford California USA.
Peter J BergquistMedStar Heart and Vascular Institute Washington DC USA.
Monvadi B SrichaiMedStar Heart and Vascular Institute Washington DC USA.
Jonathan P PicciniDuke University Hospital Durham North Carolina USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0772-2404
Steffen E PetersenBarts Heart Centre Barts Health National Health Service (NHS) Trust London United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4622-5160
Jose D VargasGeorgetown University Medical Center Washington DC USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Traditional risk scores for recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) following catheter ablation utilize readily available clinical and echocardiographic variables and yet have limited discriminatory capacity. Use of data from cardiac imaging and deep learning may help improve accuracy and prediction of recurrent AF after ablation. Methods: We evaluated patients with symptomatic, drug-refractory AF undergoing catheter ablation. All patients underwent pre-ablation cardiac computed tomography (cCT). LAVi was computed using a deep-learning algorithm. In a two-step analysis, random survival forest (RSF) was used to generate prognostic models with variables of highest importance, followed by Cox proportional hazard regression analysis of the selected variables. Events of interest included early and late recurrence. Results: Among 653 patients undergoing AF ablation, the most important factors associated with late recurrence by RSF analysis at 24 (+/-18) months follow-up included LAVi and early recurrence. In total, 5 covariates were identified as independent predictors of late recurrence: LAVi (HR per mL/m Conclusions: Machine learning-derived, full volumetric LAVi from cCT is the most important pre-procedural risk factor for late AF recurrence following catheter ablation. The combination of increased LAVi and early recurrence confers more than a four-fold increased risk of late recurrence.

Indexed as

atrial fibrillationcardiac computed tomographycatheter ablationleft atriummachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38045451
PMCPMC10692862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.