Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38045434›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2023

Predicting target lesion failure following percutaneous coronary intervention through machine learning risk assessment models.

Mamas A Mamas, Marco Roffi, Ole Fröbert, Alaide Chieffo, Alessandro Beneduce, Andrija Matetic, Pim A L Tonino, Dragica Paunovic, Lotte Jacobs, Roxane Debrus and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02188355 (Prospective, Single Arm, Multi-centre, Observational Registry to Further Validate Safety and Efficacy of the Ultimaster Des System in Unselected Patients Representing Everyday Clinical Practice), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02188355 unknown statusnot on this map

Prospective, Single Arm, Multi-centre, Observational Registry to Further Validate Safety and Efficacy of the Ultimaster Des System in Unselected Patients Representing Everyday Clinical Practice

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorTerumo Europe N.V.Ran2014 to 2020Enrolled37,000ConditionsCoronary Artery Disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Innovation in Interventional Cardiovascular Care.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mamas A MamasKeele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Institutes of Applied Clinical Science and Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele ST5 5BG, Newcastle, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9241-8890
Marco RoffiDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospitals Geneva, Geneva 1205, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3051-0170
Ole FröbertFaculty of Health, Örebro University, Örebro 701 82, Sweden.
Alaide ChieffoInterventional Cardiology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan 20132, Italy.
Alessandro BeneduceInterventional Cardiology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan 20132, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2130-1964
Andrija MateticKeele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Institutes of Applied Clinical Science and Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele ST5 5BG, Newcastle, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9272-6906
Pim A L ToninoDepartment of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven 5623, The Netherlands.
Dragica PaunovicBoard of Directors, European Cardiovascular Research Centre (CERC), Massy 91300, France.
Lotte JacobsMedical and Clinical Division, Terumo Europe NV, Leuven 3001, Belgium.
Roxane DebrusBiostatistics Division, Genmab A/S, Copenhagen 1560, Denmark.
Jérémy El AissaouiArtificial Intelligence Division, Business and Decision, Woluwe St Lambert, Brusells 1200, Belgium.
Frank van LeeuwenMedical and Clinical Division, Terumo Europe NV, Leuven 3001, Belgium.
Evangelos KontopantelisDivision of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6450-5815

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Central to the practice of precision medicine in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a risk-stratification tool to predict outcomes following the procedure. This study is intended to assess machine learning (ML)-based risk models to predict clinically relevant outcomes in PCI and to support individualized clinical decision-making in this setting. Methods and results: Five different ML models [gradient boosting classifier (GBC), linear discrimination analysis, Naïve Bayes, logistic regression, and K-nearest neighbours algorithm) for the prediction of 1-year target lesion failure (TLF) were trained on an extensive data set of 35 389 patients undergoing PCI and enrolled in the global, all-comers e-ULTIMASTER registry. The data set was split into a training (80%) and a test set (20%). Twenty-three patient and procedural characteristics were used as predictive variables. The models were compared for discrimination according to the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and for calibration. The GBC model showed the best discriminative ability with an AUC of 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.69-0.75) for 1-year TLF on the test set. The discriminative ability of the GBC model for the components of TLF was highest for cardiac death with an AUC of 0.82, followed by target vessel myocardial infarction with an AUC of 0.75 and clinically driven target lesion revascularization with an AUC of 0.68. The calibration was fair until the highest risk deciles showed an underestimation of the risk. Conclusion: Machine learning-derived predictive models provide a reasonably accurate prediction of 1-year TLF in patients undergoing PCI. A prospective evaluation of the predictive score is warranted. Registration: Clinicaltrial.gov identifier is NCT02188355.

Indexed as

Drug-eluting stentMachine learningOutcomesPercutaneous coronary interventionTarget lesion failure

Identifiers

PMID38045434
PMCPMC10689920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.