Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38045433›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2023

Developing a personalized remote patient monitoring algorithm: a proof-of-concept in heart failure.

Mehran Moazeni, Lieke Numan, Maaike Brons, Jaco Houtgraaf, Frans H Rutten, Daniel L Oberski, Linda W van Laake, Folkert W Asselbergs, Emmeke Aarts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mehran MoazeniDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University, Padualaan 14, 3584 CH, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4151-2446
Lieke NumanDepartment of Cardiology, Division Heart and Lungs, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5896-7738
Maaike BronsDepartment of Cardiology, Division Heart and Lungs, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5633-5948
Jaco HoutgraafDepartment of Cardiology, Diakonessenhuis Hospital Utrecht, Bosboomstraat 1, 3582 KE, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Frans H RuttenDepartment of General Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5052-7332
Daniel L OberskiDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University, Padualaan 14, 3584 CH, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7467-2297
Linda W van LaakeDepartment of Cardiology, Division Heart and Lungs, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5027-0661
Folkert W AsselbergsDepartment of Cardiology, Division Heart and Lungs, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1692-8669
Emmeke AartsDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University, Padualaan 14, 3584 CH, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2432-7564

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Non-invasive remote patient monitoring is an increasingly popular technique to aid clinicians in the early detection of worsening heart failure (HF) alongside regular follow-ups. However, previous studies have shown mixed results in the performance of such systems. Therefore, we developed and evaluated a personalized monitoring algorithm aimed at increasing positive-predictive-value (PPV) (i.e. alarm quality) and compared performance with simple rule-of-thumb and moving average convergence-divergence algorithms (MACD). Methods and results: In this proof-of-concept study, the developed algorithm was applied to retrospective data of daily bodyweight, heart rate, and systolic blood pressure of 74 HF-patients with a median observation period of 327 days (IQR: 183 days), during which 31 patients experienced 64 clinical worsening HF episodes. The algorithm combined information on both the monitored patients and a group of stable HF patients, and is increasingly personalized over time, using linear mixed-effect modelling and statistical process control charts. Optimized on alarm quality, heart rate showed the highest PPV (Personalized: 92%, MACD: 2%, Rule-of-thumb: 7%) with an F1 score of (Personalized: 28%, MACD: 6%, Rule-of-thumb: 8%). Bodyweight demonstrated the lowest PPV (Personalized: 16%, MACD: 0%, Rule-of-thumb: 6%) and F1 score (Personalized: 10%, MACD: 3%, Rule-of-thumb: 7%) overall compared methods. Conclusion: The personalized algorithm with flexible patient-tailored thresholds led to higher PPV, and performance was more sensitive compared to common simple monitoring methods (rule-of-thumb and MACD). However, many episodes of worsening HF remained undetected. Heart rate and systolic blood pressure monitoring outperformed bodyweight in predicting worsening HF. The algorithm source code is publicly available for future validation and improvement.

Indexed as

Dynamic monitoringHeart failureIntensive longitudinal dataProcess monitoringRemote patient monitoringStatistical process control chart

Identifiers

PMID38045433
PMCPMC10689918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.