ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
eSVD-DE: Cohort-wide differential expression in single-cell RNA-seq data using exponential-family embeddings.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA) datasets are becoming increasingly popular in clinical and cohort studies, but there is a lack of methods to investigate differentially expressed (DE) genes among such datasets with numerous individuals. While numerous methods exist to find DE genes for scRNA data from limited individuals, differential-expression testing for large cohorts of case and control individuals using scRNA data poses unique challenges due to substantial effects of human variation, i.e., individual-level confounding covariates that are difficult to account for in the presence of sparsely-observed genes. Results: We develop the eSVD-DE, a matrix factorization that pools information across genes and removes confounding covariate effects, followed by a novel two-sample test in mean expression between case and control individuals. In general, differential testing after dimension reduction yields an inflation of Type-1 errors. However, we overcome this by testing for differences between the case and control individuals' posterior mean distributions via a hierarchical model. In previously published datasets of various biological systems, eSVD-DE has more accuracy and power compared to other DE methods typically repurposed for analyzing cohort-wide differential expression. Conclusions: eSVD-DE proposes a novel and powerful way to test for DE genes among cohorts after performing a dimension reduction. Accurate identification of differential expression on the individual level, instead of the cell level, is important for linking scRNA-seq studies to our understanding of the human population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.