Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38045397›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Efficient Analysis of Annotation Colocalization Accounting for Genomic Contexts.

Askar Gafurov, Tomas Vinar, Paul Medvedev, Brona Brejova

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Askar Gafurov
Paul Medvedev

Funding

Leveraging k-mer sketching statistics to enhance metagenomic methods and alignment algorithmsR01GM146462 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Antonio Blanca Pimentel, David Koslicki · 2022 to 2026
$2.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM146462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An annotation is a set of genomic intervals sharing a particular function or property. Examples include genes or their exons, evolutionarily conserved elements, and regions with a particular epigenetic state. A common task is to compare two annotations to determine if one is enriched or depleted in the regions covered by the other. We study the problem of assigning statistical significance to such a comparison based on a null model representing two random unrelated annotations. To incorporate more background information into such analyses,we propose a new null model based on a Markov chain which differentiates among several genomic contexts. These contexts can capture various confounding factors, such as GC content or assembly gaps. We then develop a new algorithm for estimating p-values by computing the exact expectation and variance of the test statistics and then estimating the p-value using a normal approximation. Compared to the previous algorithm by Gafurov et al., the new algorithm provides three advances: (1) the running time is improved from quadratic to linear or quasi-linear, (2) the algorithm can handle two different test statistics, and (3) the algorithm can handle both simple and context-dependent Markov chain null models. We demonstrate the efficiency and accuracy of our algorithm on synthetic and real data sets, including the recent human telomere-to-telomere assembly. In particular, our algorithm computed p-values for 450 pairs of human genome annotations using 24 threads in under three hours. Moreover, the use of genomic contexts to correct for GC bias resulted in the reversal of some previously published findings.

Identifiers

PMID38045397
PMCPMC10690252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.