ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2023
Unravelling Robust Brain-Behavior Links of Depressive Symptoms Through Granular Network Models: Understanding Heterogeneity and Clinical Implications.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
30 authors at 18 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Depressive symptoms are highly prevalent, present in heterogeneous symptom patterns, and share diverse neurobiological underpinnings. Understanding the links between psychopathological symptoms and biological factors is critical in elucidating its etiology and persistence. We aimed to evaluate the utility of using symptom-brain networks to parse the heterogeneity of depressive symptomatology in a large adolescent sample. Methods: We used data from the third wave of the IMAGEN study, a multi-center panel cohort study involving 1,317 adolescents (52.49% female, mean±SD age=18.5±0.72). Two network models were estimated: one including an overall depressive symptom severity sum score based on the Adolescent Depression Rating Scale (ADRS), and one incorporating individual ADRS symptom/item scores. Both networks included measures of cortical thickness in several regions (insula, cingulate, mOFC, fusiform gyrus) and hippocampal volume derived from neuroimaging. Results: The network based on individual symptom scores revealed associations between cortical thickness measures and specific symptoms, obscured when using an aggregate depression severity score. Notably, the insula's cortical thickness showed negative associations with cognitive dysfunction (partial cor.=-0.15); the cingulate's cortical thickness showed negative associations with feelings of worthlessness (partial cor. = -0.10), and mOFC was negatively associated with anhedonia (partial cor. = -0.05). Limitations: This cross-sectional study included participants who were relatively healthy and relied on the self-reported assessment of depression symptoms. Conclusions: This study showcases the utility of network models in parsing heterogeneity in depressive symptoms, linking individual symptoms to specific neural substrates. We outline the next steps to integrate neurobiological and cognitive markers to unravel MDD's phenotypic heterogeneity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.