ArticleResearch square2023
SLIViT: a general AI framework for clinical-feature diagnosis from limited 3D biomedical-imaging data.
Article in Research square, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present SLIViT, a deep-learning framework that accurately measures disease-related risk factors in volumetric biomedical imaging, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans, and ultrasound videos. To evaluate SLIViT, we applied it to five different datasets of these three different data modalities tackling seven learning tasks (including both classification and regression) and found that it consistently and significantly outperforms domain-specific state-of-the-art models, typically improving performance (ROC AUC or correlation) by 0.1-0.4. Notably, compared to existing approaches, SLIViT can be applied even when only a small number of annotated training samples is available, which is often a constraint in medical applications. When trained on less than 700 annotated volumes, SLIViT obtained accuracy comparable to trained clinical specialists while reducing annotation time by a factor of 5,000 demonstrating its utility to automate and expedite ongoing research and other practical clinical scenarios.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.