ArticleHeliyon2023
Natural science and engineering instructors' knowledge and practice of brain-based instruction in Ethiopian higher education institutions.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, the Brain-Based Instructional approach has become an alternative instructional method in the schooling system of different countries of the world. This study explored the current situation of natural science and engineering instructors' knowledge and practices of brain-based instruction in Ethiopian higher education institutions. A descriptive survey research design with concurrent mixed methods was employed. Data collection tools were developed based on the twelve principles of brain-based learning theory and confirmed their validity and reliability. Survey questions were used to gather quantitative data from 512 randomly selected instructors. Qualitative data were collected through interviews with 14 purposely selected instructors. Classroom observation was also conducted to triangulate data obtained through interviews and survey questions. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, whereas qualitative data were analyzed thematically. The findings of this study depict that most natural science and engineering instructors have good knowledge of brain-based instruction but not transferable knowledge and skills. There is a clear gap between instructors' knowledge and classroom practice of brain-based instruction. Thus, to improve instructional practices, higher education institutions need to work strongly to narrow the existing variation. Implications and further recommendations are also suggested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.