Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38045108›Full record

ArticleSSM. Mental health2023

Maternal mental health research in Malawi: Community and healthcare provider perspectives on acceptability and ethicality.

Myness Kasanda Ndambo, Martyn Pickersgill, Christopher Bunn, Robert C Stewart, Eric Umar, Maisha Nyasulu, Andrew M McIntosh, Lucinda Manda-Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM. Mental health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Myness Kasanda NdamboMalawi Epidemiology Intervention Research Unit, Malawi.
Martyn PickersgillCentre for Biomedicine, Self and Society, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Christopher BunnMalawi Epidemiology Intervention Research Unit, Malawi.
Robert C StewartMalawi Epidemiology Intervention Research Unit, Malawi.
Eric UmarSchool of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Malawi.
Maisha NyasuluMalawi Epidemiology Intervention Research Unit, Malawi.
Andrew M McIntoshDivision of Psychiatry, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Lucinda Manda-TaylorSchool of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Malawi.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S035818/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maternal mental health (MMH) is recognised as globally significant. The prevalence of depression and factors associated with its onset among perinatal women in Malawi has been previously reported, and the need for further research in this domain is underscored. Yet, there is little published scholarship regarding the acceptability and ethicality of MMH research to women and community representatives. The study reported here sought to address this in Malawi by engaging with communities and healthcare providers in the districts where MMH research was being planned. Qualitative data was collected in Lilongwe and Karonga districts through 20 focus group discussions and 40 in-depth interviews with community representatives and healthcare providers from January through April 2021. All focus groups and interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim (in local languages Chichewa and Tumbuka), translated into English, and examined through thematic content analysis. Participants' accounts suggest that biopsychosocial MMH research could be broadly acceptable within the communities sampled, with acceptability framed in part through prior encounters with biomedical and public health research and care in these regions, alongside broader understandings of the import of MMH. Willingness and consent to participate do not depend on specifically biomedical understandings of MMH, but rather on familiarity with individuals regarded as living with mental ill-health. However, the data further suggest some 'therapeutic misconceptions' about MMH research, with implications for how investigations in this area are presented by researchers when recruiting and working with participants. Further studies are needed to explore whether accounts of the acceptability and ethicality of MMH research shift and change during and following research encounters. Such studies will enhance the production of granular recommendations for further augmenting the ethicality of biomedical and public health research and researchers' responsibilities to participants and communities.

Indexed as

AcceptabilityCommunity engagementEthicsMaternal mental healthTherapeutic misconception

Identifiers

PMID38045108
PMCPMC10311285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.