Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38045089›Full record

ArticleCanadian medical education journal2023

Exploring medical students' use of principles of self-explanation and structured reflection during clerkship.

Martine Chamberland, Vanessa Beaudoin, Isabelle Boulais, Linda Bergeron, Christina St-Onge, Tim Dubé

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian medical education journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Martine ChamberlandDepartment of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Vanessa BeaudoinDepartment of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Isabelle BoulaisDepartment of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Linda BergeronChaire de recherche en pédagogie médicale Paul Grand-Maison de la Société des médecins de l'Université de Sherbrooke, Université de Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Christina St-OngeDepartment of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Tim DubéDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: While educators observe gaps in clerkship students' clinical reasoning (CR) skills, students report few opportunities to develop them. This study aims at exploring how students who used self-explanation (SE) and structured reflection (SR) for CR learning during preclinical training, applied these learning strategies during clerkship. Methods: We conducted an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study involving medical students. With a questionnaire, we asked students how frequently they adopted behaviours related to SE and SR during clerkship. Next, we conducted a focus group with students to explore why they adopted these behaviours. Results: Fifty-two of 198 students answered the questionnaire and five participated in a focus group. Specific behaviours adopted varied from 50% to 98%. We identified three themes about why students used these strategies: as "just in time" learning strategies; to deepen their understanding and identify gaps in knowledge; to develop a practical approach to diagnosis. A fourth theme related to the balance between learning and assessment and its consequence on adopting SE behaviours. Conclusions: Students having experienced SE and SR regularly in preclinical training tend to transpose these strategies into the clerkship providing them with a practical way to reflect deliberately and capture learning opportunities of the unpredictable clinical context.

Indexed as

Clinical ClerkshipStudents, MedicalHumansLearningProblem SolvingSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID38045089
PMCPMC10689987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.