Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38045074›Full record

ArticleCanadian medical education journal2023

A brief report of aspiring medical student perceptions and behaviours concerning research experiences for selection into Canadian medical schools.

Irene Chang, Laurie Yang, Asiana Elma, Stacey A Ritz, Lawrence Grierson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian medical education journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Medical school admissions consulting: more harm than good?Canadian medical education journal · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Irene ChangMcMaster Education Research, Innovation and Theory, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada.
Laurie YangMcMaster Education Research, Innovation and Theory, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada.
Asiana ElmaDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada.
Stacey A RitzDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada.
Lawrence GriersonMcMaster Education Research, Innovation and Theory, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Aspiring medical students behave based on their perception of what is valued in the selection process. While research experience is not explicitly considered in most Canadian admissions policies, it is commonly held as valuable within aspiring medical student communities. The purpose of this study is to describe the perceptions and behaviours of aspiring medical students with respect to gaining research experience in support of their medical school applications. Methods: We surveyed prospective applicants of Canadian medical schools between August 2021 and November 2021, then compiled descriptive statistics pertaining to their perceptions and behaviours. Results: Respondents affirmed the belief that research experience is valued in medical school admissions processes. They reported spending approximately 13 hours per week engaged in research, which usually did not yield publication or presentation recognition. Conclusion: Aspiring medical students invest substantial time and energy in research experiences to benefit their applications. There is room for medical schools to be more transparent about the value of research experience in their admissions processes.

Indexed as

Students, MedicalCanadaHumansSchools, MedicalSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID38045074
PMCPMC10689996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.