ArticleHealth information science and systems2024
Viewpoint-invariant exercise repetition counting.
Article in Health information science and systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Towards an RGB camera-based live repetition counter using auto correlation with action recognition for home rehabilitation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Counting the repetition of human exercise and physical rehabilitation is common in rehabilitation and exercise training. The existing vision-based repetition counting methods less emphasize the concurrent motions in the same video, and counting skeleton in different view angles. This work analyzed the spectrogram of the pose estimation cosine similarity to count the repetition. Besides the public datasets. This work also collected exercise videos from 11 adults to verify that the proposed method can handle concurrent motion and different view angles. The presented method was validated on the University of Idaho Physical Rehabilitation Movements Data Set (UI-PRMD) and MM-fit dataset. The overall mean absolute error (MAE) for MM-fit was 0.06 with off-by-one Accuracy (OBOA) of 0.94. As for the UI-PRMD dataset, MAE was 0.06 with OBOA 0.95. We have also tested the performance in various camera locations and concurrent motions with 57 skeleton time-series videos with an overall MAE of 0.07 and OBOA of 0.91. The proposed method provides a view-angle and motion agnostic concurrent motion counting. This method can potentially use in large-scale remote rehabilitation and exercise training with only one camera. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13755-023-00258-3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.