Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38045021›Full record

ArticleHealth information science and systems2024

Viewpoint-invariant exercise repetition counting.

Yu Cheng Hsu, Tsougenis Efstratios, Kwok-Leung Tsui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health information science and systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yu Cheng HsuSchool of Data Science, City University of Hong Kong, Tat Chee Rd., Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3722-664X
Tsougenis EfstratiosAI Lab, Hospital Authority, Argyle St., Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.
Kwok-Leung TsuiSchool of Data Science, City University of Hong Kong, Tat Chee Rd., Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Counting the repetition of human exercise and physical rehabilitation is common in rehabilitation and exercise training. The existing vision-based repetition counting methods less emphasize the concurrent motions in the same video, and counting skeleton in different view angles. This work analyzed the spectrogram of the pose estimation cosine similarity to count the repetition. Besides the public datasets. This work also collected exercise videos from 11 adults to verify that the proposed method can handle concurrent motion and different view angles. The presented method was validated on the University of Idaho Physical Rehabilitation Movements Data Set (UI-PRMD) and MM-fit dataset. The overall mean absolute error (MAE) for MM-fit was 0.06 with off-by-one Accuracy (OBOA) of 0.94. As for the UI-PRMD dataset, MAE was 0.06 with OBOA 0.95. We have also tested the performance in various camera locations and concurrent motions with 57 skeleton time-series videos with an overall MAE of 0.07 and OBOA of 0.91. The proposed method provides a view-angle and motion agnostic concurrent motion counting. This method can potentially use in large-scale remote rehabilitation and exercise training with only one camera. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13755-023-00258-3.

Indexed as

CameraExerciseRepetition counting

Identifiers

PMID38045021
PMCPMC10692053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.