ReviewFrontiers in oncology2023
CPX-351 in
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real World Study on the Best CPX-351 Treatment Duration and Timing for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.American journal of hematology · 2025Trial
- Nanotechnology-enhanced CAR-T therapy strategies in cancer, aging, and autoimmune diseases.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Comparative efficacy of different therapeutic approaches in treatment naïve FLT3-mutated AML eligible for intensive chemotherapy: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized trials.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- CPX-351 and the Frontier of Nanoparticle-Based Therapeutics in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CPX-351, a dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of daunorubicin and cytarabine in a 1:5 molar ratio, is approved for the treatment of newly diagnosed therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes. In a pivotal phase III trial, CPX-351 significantly improved overall survival compared with standard-of-care 7 + 3 chemotherapy (7 days cytarabine; 3 days daunorubicin) in adults aged 60-75 years with newly diagnosed high-risk or secondary AML (median = 9.56 months vs. 5.95 months; hazard ratio = 0.69; 95% confidence interval = 0.52-0.90;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.