Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38044991›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Identification of Luminal A breast cancer by using deep learning analysis based on multi-modal images.

Menghan Liu, Shuai Zhang, Yanan Du, Xiaodong Zhang, Dawei Wang, Wanqing Ren, Jingxiang Sun, Shiwei Yang, Guang Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Deep learning in multi-modal breast cancer data fusion: a literature review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Menghan Liu *Department of Health Management, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Engineering Laboratory for Health Management, Shandong Medicine and Health Key Laboratory of Laboratory Medicine, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China.
Shuai Zhang *Department of Radiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Yanan DuDepartment of Health Management, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Engineering Laboratory for Health Management, Shandong Medicine and Health Key Laboratory of Laboratory Medicine, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China.
Xiaodong ZhangPostgraduate Department, Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences), Jinan, China.
Dawei WangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Wanqing RenPostgraduate Department, Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences), Jinan, China.
Jingxiang SunPostgraduate Department, Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences), Jinan, China.
Shiwei YangDepartment of Anorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Guang ZhangDepartment of Health Management, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Engineering Laboratory for Health Management, Shandong Medicine and Health Key Laboratory of Laboratory Medicine, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a deep learning model based on multi-modal images in identifying molecular subtype of breast cancer. Materials and methods: A total of 158 breast cancer patients (170 lesions, median age, 50.8 ± 11.0 years), including 78 Luminal A subtype and 92 non-Luminal A subtype lesions, were retrospectively analyzed and divided into a training set (n = 100), test set (n = 45), and validation set (n = 25). Mammography (MG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images were used. Five single-mode models, i.e., MG, T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion weighting imaging (DWI), axial apparent dispersion coefficient (ADC), and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), were selected. The deep learning network ResNet50 was used as the basic feature extraction and classification network to construct the molecular subtype identification model. The receiver operating characteristic curve were used to evaluate the prediction efficiency of each model. Results: The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of a multi-modal tool for identifying Luminal A subtype were 0.711, 0.889, and 0.593, respectively, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.802 (95% CI, 0.657- 0.906); the accuracy, sensitivity, and AUC were higher than those of any single-modal model, but the specificity was slightly lower than that of DCE-MRI model. The AUC value of MG, T2WI, DWI, ADC, and DCE-MRI model was 0.593 (95%CI, 0.436-0.737), 0.700 (95%CI, 0.545-0.827), 0.564 (95%CI, 0.408-0.711), 0.679 (95%CI, 0.523-0.810), and 0.553 (95%CI, 0.398-0.702), respectively. Conclusion: The combination of deep learning and multi-modal imaging is of great significance for diagnosing breast cancer subtypes and selecting personalized treatment plans for doctors.

Indexed as

breast cancerdeep learningmammographymolecular subtypeMRImulti-modality

Identifiers

PMID38044991
PMCPMC10691590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.