ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Identification of Luminal A breast cancer by using deep learning analysis based on multi-modal images.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Molecular Subtype Prediction From Medical Imaging: A Systematic Review of Literature.Technology in cancer research & treatmentPooled it
- Non-Invasive Breast Cancer Receptor Typing from Mammograms Using Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
- Deep learning in multi-modal breast cancer data fusion: a literature review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Review
- Review
- Multimodal imaging and advanced quantitative techniques for HER-2 status prediction in breast cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a deep learning model based on multi-modal images in identifying molecular subtype of breast cancer. Materials and methods: A total of 158 breast cancer patients (170 lesions, median age, 50.8 ± 11.0 years), including 78 Luminal A subtype and 92 non-Luminal A subtype lesions, were retrospectively analyzed and divided into a training set (n = 100), test set (n = 45), and validation set (n = 25). Mammography (MG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images were used. Five single-mode models, i.e., MG, T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion weighting imaging (DWI), axial apparent dispersion coefficient (ADC), and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), were selected. The deep learning network ResNet50 was used as the basic feature extraction and classification network to construct the molecular subtype identification model. The receiver operating characteristic curve were used to evaluate the prediction efficiency of each model. Results: The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of a multi-modal tool for identifying Luminal A subtype were 0.711, 0.889, and 0.593, respectively, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.802 (95% CI, 0.657- 0.906); the accuracy, sensitivity, and AUC were higher than those of any single-modal model, but the specificity was slightly lower than that of DCE-MRI model. The AUC value of MG, T2WI, DWI, ADC, and DCE-MRI model was 0.593 (95%CI, 0.436-0.737), 0.700 (95%CI, 0.545-0.827), 0.564 (95%CI, 0.408-0.711), 0.679 (95%CI, 0.523-0.810), and 0.553 (95%CI, 0.398-0.702), respectively. Conclusion: The combination of deep learning and multi-modal imaging is of great significance for diagnosing breast cancer subtypes and selecting personalized treatment plans for doctors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.