Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38044958›Full record

ArticleHemaSphere2023

CAR-T Cell Therapy Shows Similar Efficacy and Toxicity in Patients With DLBCL Regardless of CNS Involvement.

Evgenii Shumilov, Hristo Boyadzhiev, Paolo Mazzeo, Dilara Akhoundova, Michael Daskalakis, Urban Novak, Georg Lenz, Ulrike Bacher, Thomas Pabst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HemaSphere, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Updates of primary central nervous system lymphoma.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Evgenii ShumilovDepartment of Medicine A, Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital Münster (UKM), Germany.
Hristo BoyadzhievHabichtswald Hospital, Kassel, Germany.
Paolo MazzeoClinics of Hematology and Medical Oncology, INDIGHO Laboratory, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6317-0216
Dilara AkhoundovaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Michael DaskalakisDepartment of Hematology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Urban NovakDepartment of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Georg LenzDepartment of Medicine A, Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital Münster (UKM), Germany.
Ulrike BacherDepartment of Hematology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Thomas PabstDepartment of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficacy and toxicity of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in relapsed/refractory (r/r) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with central nervous system (CNS) involvement remain understudied. Here we analyzed the outcomes of CAR-T cell therapy in r/r DLBCL patients with CNS involvement and compared them with patients without CNS disease. Retrospective and monocentric comparative analysis of patient cohort with r/r DLBCL treated with CAR-T cell therapy: 15 patients with CNS versus 65 patients without CNS involvement. Overall response rates (80% versus 80%;

Identifiers

PMID38044958
PMCPMC10691788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.