Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38044665›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science2024

Treatment with psychostimulants and atomoxetine in people with psychotic disorders: reassessing the risk of clinical deterioration in a real-world setting.

Olivier Corbeil, Sébastien Brodeur, Josiane Courteau, Laurent Béchard, Maxime Huot-Lavoie, Elaine Angelopoulos, Samanta Di Stefano, Erica Marrone, Alain Vanasse, Marie-Josée Fleury and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Olivier CorbeilFaculty of Pharmacy, Laval University, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4192-853X
Sébastien BrodeurDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Laval University, Quebec, Canada; and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7755-9043
Josiane CourteauPRIMUS Research Group, Research Centre of Sherbrooke University Hospital Center (CRCHUS), Sherbrooke, Canada.
Laurent BéchardFaculty of Pharmacy, Laval University, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6697-1799
Maxime Huot-LavoieFaculty of Pharmacy, Laval University, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7378-9776
Elaine AngelopoulosFaculty of Pharmacy, Laval University, Quebec, Canada.
Samanta Di StefanoFaculty of Pharmacy, Laval University, Quebec, Canada.
Erica MarroneFaculty of Pharmacy, Laval University, Quebec, Canada.
Alain VanassePRIMUS Research Group, Research Centre of Sherbrooke University Hospital Center (CRCHUS), Sherbrooke, Canada; and Department of Family Medicine and Urgent Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Marie-Josée FleuryDouglas Research Centre, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, Canada; and Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4743-8611
Emmanuel StipDepartment de Psychiatry and Addictology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada; and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, College of Medicine and Health Science, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE.ORCID 0000-0003-2859-2100
Alain LesageDepartment of Psychiatry and Addictology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada; and Research Centre, Montreal University Institute of Mental Health, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4226-4683
Ridha JooberDouglas Research Centre, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, Canada; and Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Marie-France DemersFaculty of Pharmacy, Laval University, Quebec, Canada; and CERVO Research Centre, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4045-9890
Marc-André RoyDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Laval University, Quebec, Canada; and CERVO Research Centre, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0123-6651
Université Laval · CADouglas Mental Health University Institute · CAUniversité de Sherbrooke · CAKing's College London · GBUnited Arab Emirates University · AE

Funding

Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé Données de recherche en contexte réel - Parten
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is often comorbid with schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders (SZSPD), concerns about an increased risk of psychotic events have limited its treatment with either psychostimulants or atomoxetine.

aimsTo examine whether the risk of hospital admission for psychosis in people with SZSPD was increased during the year following the introduction of such medications compared with the year before.

methodThis was a retrospective cohort study using Quebec (Canada) administrative health registries, including all Quebec residents with a public prescription drug insurance plan and a diagnosis of psychotic disorder, defined by relevant ICD-9 or ICD-10 codes, who initiated either methylphenidate, amphetamines or atomoxetine, between January 2010 and December 2016, in combination with antipsychotic medication. The primary outcome was time to hospital admission for psychosis within 1 year of initiation. State sequence analysis was also used to visualise admission trajectories for psychosis in the year following initiation of these medications, compared with the previous year.

resultsOut of 2219 individuals, 1589 (71.6%) initiated methylphenidate, 339 (15.3%) amphetamines and 291 (13.1%) atomoxetine during the study period. After adjustment, the risk of hospital admission for psychosis was decreased during the 12 months following the introduction of these medications when used in combination with antipsychotics (adjusted HR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.24-0.54;

conclusionsThese findings suggest that, in a real-world setting, when used concurrently with antipsychotic medication, methylphenidate, amphetamines and atomoxetine may be safer than generally believed in individuals with psychotic disorders.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityCentral Nervous System StimulantsClinical DeteriorationMethylphenidatePsychotic DisordersAmphetaminesAtomoxetine HydrochlorideHumansRetrospective StudiesAmphetaminesAntipsychotic AgentsAtomoxetine HydrochlorideCentral Nervous System StimulantsMethylphenidateAttention-deficit hyperactivity disordersCNS stimulantscomorbiditydrug or substance interactions and side-effectspsychotic disorders/schizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID38044665
PMCPMC10884826
OpenAlexW4389311274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.