ArticleZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences
Value and influencing factors of preoperative MRI evaluation for previous cesarean scar defect associated abnormal uterine bleeding in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.
Article in Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of the Er-Kay Classification: A Novel Volume-Based Assessment of Cesarean Scar Defects and Their Association with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Improving Precision and Safety in Uterine Isthmocele Repair by Utilizing the KOH Cup and Firefly Guidance.Cureus · 2025Article
- Exosomes derived from hUC-MSCs exhibit ameliorative efficacy upon previous cesarean scar defect via orchestrating β-TrCP/CHK1 axis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Analyzing Influencing Factors of Uterine Rupture in Pregnant Women with Scarred Uterus Undergoing Repeat Delivery and Evaluating the Predictive Value of Lower Uterine Anterior Wall Thickness.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- Clinical study of two reversible arterial blockade methods in the treatment of scar pregnancy under combined hysterolaparoscopy.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesAs the cesarean section rate increases year by year, the treatment of previous cesarean scar defects (PCSD) poses a significant challenge. This study aims to evaluate the clinical value of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology and analyze relevant influencing factors for patients with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) associated with cesarean scar defects who underwent laparoscopic surgery.
methodsA retrospective cohort analysis was performed on women who underwent laparoscopic surgery for PCSD-related AUB at the Department of Gynecology, the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from 2018 to 2022. A total of 57 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of AUB associated with PCSD were divided into 2 groups based on their postoperative clinical cure status: The clinically-cured group (
resultsThere were no significant differences in many aspects, including the patient's age at the time of previous cesarean section, number of pregnancy, time since the previous cesarean section, the uterus position assessed by preoperative T
conclusionsThe time of onset of AUB symptoms and the depth of the defect on preoperative MRI are risk factors that influence the clinical cure rate of laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of AUB associated with PCSD, which could be helpful for evaluating the prognosis of disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.