Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38044451›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2023

The meaning of dying and death for children, their carers, and families: a scoping review.

Christina M Lamb, Kianna Ramer, Oluwakemi Amodu, Kelsey Groenenboom

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christina M LambSt. Michael's College, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 81 St. Mary Street, M5S 1J4. christina.lamb@utoronto.ca.
Kianna RamerStollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Oluwakemi AmoduUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Kelsey GroenenboomFoothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe meaning of dying and death are underexplored concepts for Canadian children. Subsequently, it is unclear how children and stakeholders make meaning of children's holistic health needs at the end of life.

methodsA scoping review of the international scholarly literature was conducted. Thirteen data sources were searched to search the scholarly literature without date limits until January 2022. Studies were included on the basis of population: children (aged 0-19 years), families and caregivers; setting (in Canada and end-of-life or dying phases of living) and concepts of interest (dying and death).

resultsOf the 7377 studies identified, 12 were included for data extraction and content thematic analysis. The themes and subthemes include: 1) valuing the whole person; 2) living while dying; 3) authentic death talk; 4) a supportive approach (with lack and presence of support as subthemes); and, 5) a personalist approach.

conclusionsThere is a pressing need for research into the meaning of dying and death for children, their carers and families in Canada. Lack of holistic care, authentic death talk, specialized pediatric palliative care providers, a personalist approach and communities of support present major gaps in care for Canadian children. Research is urgently needed to address these knowledge gaps to generate policy and support practice for dying children in Canada.

Indexed as

Hospice and Palliative Care NursingTerminal CareAdolescentCanadaCaregiversChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPalliative CareYoung AdultCaregiversDeathFamilyPalliative carePediatricsScoping review

Identifiers

PMID38044451
PMCPMC10694886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.