ArticleBMC ophthalmology2023
Low-level laser therapy combined with scleral graft transplantation in the treatment of contracted socket: a clinical study.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- LLLT accelerates experimental wound healing under microgravity conditions via PI3K/AKT-CCR2 signal axis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyse the efficacy of the therapeutic use of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on the tissue repair process of allogeneic scleral grafts in patients with contracted sockets by analysing the speed of graft vascularisation and fornice depth of contraction percentage.
methodsA retrospective chart review was performed from April 2015 to April 2021 including 39patients with socket contraction. Allogeneic scleral grafts were used to repair the sockets in all patients. They were randomly enrolled into two groups. The laser group included 18 patients treated with LLLT after the surgery, whereas the control group included 21 patients without LLLT after the surgery who healed naturally. The LLLT equipment used in the research had a wavelength of 650 nm, 10 mW power, and 3.8 J/cm
resultsThe laser group presented a significantly increased speed of conjunctival vascularisation compared with the control group (P = 0.003). The fornice depth of contraction percentage was more apparent in the control group than that in the laser group (P = 0.000).
conclusionLLLT accelerates conjunctival vascularisation, stimulates conjunctival incision healing within a short period, shortens the tissue repair process, reduces the local inflammatory response, and causes no significant shrinkage of the conjunctival sac.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.