Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38044385›Full record

ReviewMedical & biological engineering & computing2024

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as a tool for cognitive enhancement in healthy adults: a review study.

Mostafa Asgarinejad, Marzieh Saviz, Seyyed Mostafa Sadjadi, Sarah Saliminia, Amineh Kakaei, Peyman Esmaeili, Ahmad Hammoud, Elias Ebrahimzadeh, Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Mostafa AsgarinejadInstitute for Cognitive Sciences Studies, Tehran, Iran.
Marzieh SavizFaculty of Psychology and Education, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. saviz@ut.ac.ir.
Seyyed Mostafa SadjadiCIPCE, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Sarah SaliminiaBiomedical Engineering Department, School of Electrical Engineering, Payame Noor University of North Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Amineh KakaeiDepartment of Clinical Psychology, School of Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Peyman EsmaeiliDepartment of Health, Safety and Environment, Shahid Beheshti Medical University, Tehran, Iran.
Ahmad HammoudDepartment of Medical and Technical Information Technology, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, Russia.
Elias EbrahimzadehSchool of Cognitive Sciences, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran, Iran. elias.ebrahimzadeh@ipm.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8682-936X
Hamid Soltanian-ZadehCIPCE, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7302-6856
University of Tehran · IRBauman Moscow State Technical University · RUInstitute for Cognitive Science Studies · IRInstitute for Research in Fundamental Sciences · IRIran University of Medical Sciences · IRPayame Noor University · IRShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As human beings, we have always sought to expand on our abilities, including our cognitive and motor skills. One of the still-underrated tools employed to this end is repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Until recently, rTMS was almost exclusively used in studies with rehabilitation purposes. Only a small strand of literature has focused on the application of rTMS on healthy people with the aim of enhancing cognitive abilities such as decision-making, working memory, attention, source memory, cognitive control, learning, computational speed, risk-taking, and impulsive behaviors. It, therefore, seems that the findings in this particular field are the indirect results of rehabilitation research. In this review paper, we have set to investigate such studies and evaluate the rTMS effectuality in terms of how it improves the cognitive skills in healthy subjects. Furthermore, since the most common brain site used for rTMS protocols is the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), we have added theta burst stimulation (TBS) wave patterns that are similar to brain patterns to increase the effectiveness of this method. The results of this study can help people who have high-risk jobs including firefighters, surgeons, and military officers with their job performance.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultBrainCognitionHumansPrefrontal CortexTreatment OutcomeClassificationCognitive enhancementDorso-lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC)Electroencephalography (EEG)Major depressive disorder (MDD)Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

Identifiers

PMID38044385
OpenAlexW4389292432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.